Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415369
| From | Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Add support for PWM Capture |
| Date | 2016-06-06 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rH7L4-9J-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqGlQ-lQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtblw-28S-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rH4Nc-6KM-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:32:31 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Hi Lee, > > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:18:04 +0100 > > Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > The first part of this set extends the current PWM API to allow external > > > code to request a PWM Capture. Subsequent patches then make use of the > > > new API by providing a userspace offering via /sysfs. The final part of > > > the set supplies PWM Capture functionality into the already existing STi > > > PWM driver. > > > > Is there a reason you decided to not put this driver in IIO? IMHO, it > > would be more appropriate to make your PWM device an MFD that can either > > bind to the PWM or the capture driver. > > And BTW, IIO already has a sysfs interface (you may have to extend the > > API to support your type of capture though). > > Multi-Function Device drivers can only be justified if the IP > contained does not and can not live in a single subsystem. The IP > which controls both PWM-in and PWM-out in this device is the same. I > can't fathom a sane reason why you would wish to separate this > functionality over multiple subsystems. > Well, I still think what you describe as PWM-in is actually a capture device that would perfectly fit in the IIO subsystem, and I guess you can't use the PWM IP as a capture and waveform generator device as the same time, which is why I suggested the MFD approach to select the mode. Anyway, I'm not the PWM or the IIO maintainer, so I'm just sharing my opinion here. Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Add support for PWM Capture Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Add support for PWM Capture Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-06 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Add support for PWM Capture Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 09:50 +0200
csiph-web