Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1413663

Re: [PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation

From Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation
Date 2016-06-04 08:30 +0200
Message-ID <rGdfP-5ht-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rFSEp-MK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFSEq-MK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rG3zQ-7MZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:03:26 -0700
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:23:01AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > The current implementation always round down the duty and period
> > values, while it would be better to round them to the closest integer.  
> 
> Agreed. As I noted to you elsewhere, not having this change can cause
> problems where doing a series of pwm_get_state() / modify /
> pwm_apply_state() will propagate rounding errors, which will change the
> period unexpectedly. e.g., I have an expected period of 3.333 us and a
> clk rate of 112.666667 MHz -- the clock frequency doesn't divide evenly,
> so the period (stashed in nanoseconds) shrinks when we convert to the
> register value and back, as follows:
> 
>  pwm_apply_state(): register = period * 112666667 / 1000000000;
>  pwm_get_state(): period = register * 1000000000 / 112666667;
> 
> or in other words:
> 
>  period = period * 112666667 / 1000000000 * 1000000000 / 112666667;
> 
> which yields a sequence like:
> 
>  3333 -> 3328
>  3328 -> 3319
>  3319 -> 3310
>  3310 -> 3301
>  3301 -> 3292
>  3292 -> ... (etc) ...
> 
> With this patch, we'd see instead:
> 
>  period = div_round_closest(period * 112666667, 1000000000) * 1000000000 / 112666667;
> 
> which yields a stable sequence:
> 
>  3333 -> 3337
>  3337 -> 3337
>  3337 -> ... (etc) ...

Woh! Thanks for the detailed explanation. Do you want me to put that in
a comment explaining why we're using DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL()?


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-03 10:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle  approximation Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-06-03 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle  approximation Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-04 08:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle  approximation Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-06-07 19:30 +0200

csiph-web