Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1414857

Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2)

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/06/16 12:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 2:09:07 AM CEST Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>> arm-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>>
>> Warnings:
>>         ../drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:1170:6: warning: unused variable 'r' [-Wunused-variable]
>>         ../drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi5.c:123:6: warning: unused variable 'r' [-Wunused-variable]
> 
> These got introduced by Fixes: 973999aa0140 ("drm/omap: Remove
> regulator API abuse") in 4.7-rc2, and are trivial to fix, I can provide a
> patch if needed.

Hrm, I don't remember sending that patch, I have sent:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/28/361

The patch I have sent did not have 'r' unused.

I can send follow-up patches to fix the unused variable.

> 
> I also have a couple of other regression fixes in my local tree 
> that I hope to see in 4.7, but with DRM I never know when to resend
> them, as they sometimes do not show up in linux-next before they get
> merged into mainline.
> 
> This is my current backlog:
> 
> d703eb3c7606 [IN NEXT] drm: sun4i: fix probe error handling
> ee0d3dafedb7 [IN NEXT] drm: sun4i: print DMA address correctly
> 4b51817edcd0 [IN NEXT] drm/sun4i: add COMMON_CLK dependency
> 04197e0d8201 [SUBMITTED 20160516] drm: exynos: mark pm functions as __maybe_unused
> 1aa3f513d264 [SUBMITTED 20160516] drm: mediatek: add CONFIG_OF dependency
> dee4d1c31214 [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm: mediatek: remove IOMMU_DMA select
> 845cd86005ea [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm/omap: include linux/of.h where needed
> d657e5dd56c5 [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm: mediatek: add COMMON_CLK dependency
> 539c2a57be6f [SUBMITTED x2 20160225] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in wait_vblank
> 921b0acae44c [SUBMITTED 2015012drm: armada: use dma_addr_t properly
> 
> Am I right to assume that as the first eight that are all regressions against
> 4.6 will show up in 4.7 without me doing anything further, but that I should
> resend the last two so they can make it into 4.8, and get backported if
> necessary?
> 
> 	Arnd
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel-build-reports mailing list
> Kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports
> 


-- 
Péter

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-06-06 11:50 +0200
  Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2) Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-06-06 12:10 +0200
    Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2) Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> - 2016-06-06 12:20 +0200
      Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-06-06 12:30 +0200

csiph-web