Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1413550
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write |
| Date | 2016-06-04 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rG5UZ-Ei-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qXPKi-8sh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXPKj-8sh-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY0Po-7NH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFZZf-5w1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:13:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So I've been playing with this again because Jason's atomic_long_t > patches made a mess of things. > > (similar findings for both ia64 and s390, suggesting killing all > arch/*/include/asm/rwsem.h might actuyally be an option). > Blergh; so looking at more asm there's still a few tricks we cannot do. So while overall size is down, some paths do end up more expensive. (It typically boils down to creative use of condition flags, which is very hard in C)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-03 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-04 00:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-09 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-09 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-10 20:00 +0200
csiph-web