Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

From	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx
Date	2016-06-03 23:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rG4vT-8lx-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <rErwD-2fk-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEsVI-2ZZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEwFX-5sh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEyy6-6IE-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEBFD-B5-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	LWN.net

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 30 May 2016 23:05:34 +0300
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:

> To be clear, the "sphinx-for-docs-next" branch of [1], [2] is what I
> propose to merge at this time. There's the Sphinx configuration, kernel
> build integration, Sphinx kernel-doc extension, tons of kernel-doc
> updates, etc. 

OK, I do believe that I am ready to do that.  Many, many thanks for doing
this work!  Please drop me a note when you think that the branch is ready
to go.

> There is no DocBook tmpl conversion; all of that is left
> to the authors (owners, maintainers) of the documents, but this enables
> them to focus on that part.

I would like to have some actual documents in there in the near future,
so that interested folks have something to look at and start with.  Maybe
I'll do that myself with some of the docbooks without active maintainers,
or even, maybe, some of the .txt files :)

Thanks,

jon

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-06-03 23:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2016-06-04 01:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2016-06-04 13:50 +0200

csiph-web