Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1412091

RE: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Masters [mailto:jcm@redhat.com]
> Sent: 02 June 2016 08:32
> To: Gabriele Paoloni; Tomasz Nowicki; helgaas@kernel.org;
> arnd@arndb.de; will.deacon@arm.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com;
> rafael@kernel.org; hanjun.guo@linaro.org; Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com;
> okaya@codeaurora.org; jchandra@broadcom.com
> Cc: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com; mw@semihalf.com;
> Liviu.Dudau@arm.com; ddaney@caviumnetworks.com; Wangyijing;
> Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com; msalter@redhat.com; linux-
> pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linaro-
> acpi@lists.linaro.org; jcm@redhat.com; andrea.gallo@linaro.org;
> dhdang@apm.com; jeremy.linton@arm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host
> controller
> 
> On 06/01/2016 03:36 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> 
> > If you agree I think Jon can tell who's the best person to
> > push the quirk RFC (as my understanding is that this mechanism
> > is currently used by some platforms deployed on the market...)
> 
> Let me ping Linaro folks to see who has that (quirks) ball. We can
> certainly share the older OEM matching quirks Mark Salter did for
> earlier RHEL(SA) internal versions as a seed for that[0] activity.

Tomasz has posted the RFC so we'll start to look at that

> 
> BUT...I don't think we should block this thread on the quirks. They're
> separate (but important). I see Arnd's reply as well, but nobody else
> has yet chimed in to this thread (and I am about to prod all of the
> vendors to reply to this thread and ACK). Can I ask whether we can't
> just stage v8 as-is for -next at this point? Can Arnd's (or other)
> suggestions be handled as followup patches post-merge please? Bjorn?

I will ask HiSilicon folks to test it so we can add Tested-by on this

Thanks

Gab

> 
> Jon.
> 
> [0] RHEL(SA) has had three different PCIe enabled ACPI stacks
> maintained
> independently so far since we need PCIe to boot most of the hundreds of
> v8 systems we have internal to Red Hat - which all have PCI.
> 
> --
> Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RE: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> - 2016-06-01 09:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> - 2016-06-02 09:40 +0200
    RE: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> - 2016-06-02 12:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> - 2016-06-02 11:00 +0200
    RE: [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> - 2016-06-02 12:00 +0200

csiph-web