Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1412882

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t

From Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t
Date 2016-06-03 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <rFSl4-Gj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rzBmV-5OI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzBPY-6dy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzLcB-3QQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:12:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
> > > since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> > > the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
> > 
> > I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
> > patches into a single patch.
> > 
> > I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
> > it does add noise to the series.
> > 
> > Other than that it all looks fine to me.
> 
> OK, done.
> 
> ---
> Subject: locking,rwsem: Remove rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update()
> From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:38:02 -0700

So I tried to pick up this series, and it broke the Alpha and IA64 builds:

/home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h: In function '___down_write':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h:58:7: error: incompatible types when 
assigning to type 'long int' from type 'atomic_long_t'
   old = sem->count;
       ^

home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h: In function '__down_read':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h:28:11: error: incompatible types 
when assigning to type 'long int' from type 'atomic_long_t'
  oldcount = sem->count;
           ^

etc.

btw., for some reason I don't have the mails from Jason in my mbox, perhaps GMail 
spam filtering ate it?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 10:10 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-03 14:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-03 14:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-06-04 01:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-06-03 20:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-03 20:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-04 00:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to  atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-06-04 01:10 +0200

csiph-web