Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target()

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target()
Date	2016-06-03 05:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rFNOp-6gK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rFbSN-7iv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFbSN-7iv-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFkjn-4fq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFpCp-7NR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFFxw-16B-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 02-06-16, 11:28, Steve Muckle wrote:
> Shouldn't we be able to avoid extra function calls through the use of
> macros/inlines? Otherwise this is making things slower for schedutil
> than it is today. 
> 
> Actually cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() shouldn't require any calls from
> schedutil when a freq_table is available - the whole thing could be run
> inline.

I will see what I can do on that. Thanks.

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-01 12:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-06-01 21:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 03:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 20:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-03 05:20 +0200

csiph-web