Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1412599

Re: script relative shebang

Show all headers | View raw

I still think it is a good thing to do.
I will try to implement it on github and may be some day someone influential will help me with that :)

On 2 June 2016 05:19:34 BST, Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:04:46AM +0100, Boris Rybalkin wrote:
>> Sorry for insisting, but I would like to explore potential solutions
>> for fixing the root problem (missing relative shebang),
>> I know there are ways to workaround that, but I would like to make
>> sure the proper fix is not possible.
>> I understood that it is too late to introduce additional keywords
>> after #! as existing systems expect fs path there, OK.
>> But what about changing #! itself, is it possible to introduce
>another
>> special sequence like #? to denote a relative mode:
>> 
>> #?python/bin/python
>> 
>If you are able to get that accepted, it will only work on linux
>systems running such recent kernels.  For your own systems, you can
>of course do whatever you wish.  But for public availability you
>will then need to wait several years until your target linux users
>can be expected to have moved to a suitable kernel (presumably the
>*next* long-term stable kernel after the change is accepted : I
>guess that version is perhaps the best part of a year away even if
>your change got accepted into 4.8, and then you need your users'
>distros to move to it).
>
>To me, that doesn't seem worth the trouble (to you) of coding it,
>getting it reviewed and eventually accepted, and then fixing up
>whatever problems arise after it gets into linux-next [ problems
>will always appear, even if the new code turns out not to be the
>cause ].
>
>And first, you have to persuade somebody influential that this is a
>good thing to do, particularly when people have suggested
>alternative approaches.  I don't count, but at the moment I've not
>seen any good reasons why the kernel should be changed to support
>this.
>
>But it's your time, and your itch to scratch.
>
>ĸen

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

script relative shebang Boris Rybalkin <ribalkin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 23:50 +0200
  Re: script relative shebang Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 01:10 +0200
    Re: script relative shebang Boris <ribalkin@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 10:10 +0200
      Re: script relative shebang Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> - 2016-06-01 15:20 +0200
      Re: script relative shebang "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 17:40 +0200
        Re: script relative shebang Boris Rybalkin <ribalkin@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 02:10 +0200
          Re: script relative shebang Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com> - 2016-06-02 06:30 +0200
            Re: script relative shebang Boris <ribalkin@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 00:50 +0200

csiph-web