Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1410900
| From | Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns |
| Date | 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rF9ei-5BV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the
user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple
users in unprivileged containers map to the same underlying
real user (e.g. user_struct) the inotify limits are going to be
shared as well which can lead to unplesantries. This is a problem
since any user inside any of the containers can potentially exhaust
the instance/watches limit which in turn might prevent certain
services from other containers from starting.
The solution I propose is rather simple, instead of accounting the
watches/instances per user_struct, start accounting them in a hashtable,
where the index used is the hashed pointer of the userns. This way
the administrator needn't set the inotify limits very high and also
the risk of one container breaching the limits and affecting every
other container is alleviated.
I have performed functional testing to validate that limits in
different namespaces are indeed separate, as well as running
multiple inotify stressers from stress-ng to ensure I haven't
introduced any race conditions.
This series is based on 4.7-rc1 (and applies cleanly on 4.4.10) and
consist of the following 4 patches:
Patch 1: This introduces the necessary structure and code changes. Including
hashtable.h to sched.h causes some warnings in files which define HAS_SIZE macro,
patch 3 fixes this by doing mechanical rename.
Patch 2: This patch flips the inotify code to user the new infrastructure.
Patch 3: This is a simple mechanical rename of conflicting definitions with
hashtable.h's HASH_SIZE macro. I'm happy about comments how I should go
about this.
Patch 4: This is a rather self-container patch and can go irrespective of
whether the series is accepted, it's needed so that building the kernel
with !CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER doesn't fail (with patch 1 being applied).
However, fdinfo.c doesn't really need inotify.h
Nikolay Borisov (4):
inotify: Add infrastructure to account inotify limits per-namespace
inotify: Convert inotify limits to be accounted
per-realuser/per-namespace
misc: Rename the HASH_SIZE macro
inotify: Don't include inotify.h when !CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER
fs/logfs/dir.c | 6 +--
fs/notify/fdinfo.c | 3 ++
fs/notify/inotify/inotify.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 14 ++++++-
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 1 +
include/linux/sched.h | 5 ++-
kernel/user.c | 13 ++++++
net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c | 8 ++--
net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 10 ++---
net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c | 10 ++---
net/ipv6/sit.c | 10 ++---
security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c | 32 +++++++--------
13 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
--
2.5.0
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] inotify: Convert inotify limits to be accounted per-realuser/per-namespace Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] inotify: Add infrastructure to account inotify limits per-namespace Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] inotify: Add infrastructure to account inotify limits per-namespace Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] inotify: Add infrastructure to account inotify limits per-namespace Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-06 11:30 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] inotify: Don't include inotify.h when !CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] misc: Rename the HASH_SIZE macro Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-01 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] misc: Rename the HASH_SIZE macro David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-06-01 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-01 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-02 08:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-02 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-06-02 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-02 19:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-03 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-03 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-06-06 08:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-06 22:20 +0200
csiph-web