Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1408643
| From | "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation |
| Date | 2016-05-29 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEe6m-1x2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rEd0C-Ss-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined
> preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef:
Damn, I had hoped that would work universally; I tried to avoid the
uglier #if-inside-#ifdef construction. GCC 6 is quite happy wth it.
But no objections.
If you want:
Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
But here's an alternative. Geert, what do you think of this?
diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c
index c9549c8b..8ea1d2ca 100644
--- a/lib/test_hash.c
+++ b/lib/test_hash.c
@@ -221,17 +221,17 @@ test_hash_init(void)
/* Issue notices about skipped tests. */
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
+#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 + 0 != 1
pr_info("__hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
+#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 + 0 != 1
pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
+#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 + 0 != 1
pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] test/hash: Fix warning in two-dimensional array init Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-29 19:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-29 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-29 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-29 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] test/hash: Fix warning in two-dimensional array init "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-29 20:50 +0200
csiph-web