Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1410267

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression
Date 2016-05-31 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <rERho-2Kk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rENdL-eU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rENnr-iy-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:34:36PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Ingo,
> 
> Part of the regression has been recovered in v4.7-rc1 from -32.9% to
> -9.8%.  But there is still some regression.  Is it possible for fully
> restore it?

after much searching on how you guys run hackbench... I figured
something like:

  perf bench sched messaging -g 20 --thread -l 60000

on my IVB-EP (2*10*2) is similar to your IVT thing.

And running something like:

  for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor ; do echo performance > $i ; done
  perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 20 --thread -l 60000 | grep "seconds time elapsed"

gets me:

v4.6:

      36.786914089 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.49% )
      37.054017355 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.05% )


origin/master (v4.7-rc1-ish):

      34.757435264 seconds time elapsed ( +-  3.34% )
      35.396252515 seconds time elapsed ( +-  3.38% )


Which doesn't show a regression between v4.6 and HEAD; in fact it shows
an improvement.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-05-31 10:40 +0200
  Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9%  regression Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-31 14:50 +0200
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-06-01 07:10 +0200
      Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9%  regression Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-01 10:50 +0200
        Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-06-01 11:00 +0200
          Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput  -32.9% regression Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 11:50 +0200
            Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-06-02 02:30 +0200
              Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput  -32.9% regression Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 02:50 +0200

csiph-web