Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1409781
| From | Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs |
| Date | 2016-05-31 04:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEHBn-4Ct-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rBVAR-4HP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEs9j-2s5-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rExsm-63s-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016年05月30日 23:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:59:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2016年05月23日 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun >>> rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer. >>> My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase >>> in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer >>> with indices does not perform that well, because >>> each index access causes a cache line to bounce between >>> CPUs, and index access causes stalls due to the dependency. >> I change tun to use skb array, looks like it can give about 5% more faster >> than skb ring. > OK and skb ring is 9% faster than the linked list, so together > this is a 14% speedup? Right. > >> And we usually don't need touch bhs during consume and produce (e.g for the >> case of tun). >> >> Thanks > Maybe I'll drop it in v6 then ... > Could you post the full tun patchset please? > Since it needs no bh versions of produce/consume, maybe you can post v6 first, then I can post the tun patches?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-05-23 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-05-23 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-05-30 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-05-30 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-05-31 04:30 +0200
csiph-web