Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1408299

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] of: overlays: New target methods

From Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] of: overlays: New target methods
Date 2016-05-27 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <rDwI2-861-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rzx9E-3hX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDaRc-30z-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDrfj-4Hd-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/27/2016 7:46 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
>> On May 27, 2016, at 00:15 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/16/2016 1:18 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> This patchset implements two new target methods.
>>>
>>> A target index method which allows selecting different
>>> targets according to an argument using an extended API and
>>> a target root method that fences the target only
>>> to a specific given root.
>>>
>>> Documentation and unit-tests are included.
>>
>> I think you are attacking the problem the wrong way.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the problem statement is:
>>
>>  In some cases, a devicetree overlay is meant to describe
>>  a pluggable piece of hardware, which may be plugged into
>>  various locations on a platform.  It should be possible
>>  to apply a single devicetree to one or more locations
>>  on a given platform.
>>
>> If that is the case, then putting the locations where the
>> overlay can be applied into the devicetree is not the
>> approach that I would use.  It seems it would be better
>> to specify the target location as a separate item from
>> the overlay to the method that applies the devicetree.
>> In that case, I would put the node(s) describing the
>> pluggable hardware in the root node of the overlay
>> devicetree (dtc expects a root node).  The apply
>> method can easily find the node(s) and relocate them
>> to the appropriate location in the platform's
>> devicetree.
>>
> 
> It’s a bit more complicated. This was considered initially
> but we ended up with the targets on the overlay.
> 
> It can work either way, but the problem with storing the
> indirect targets in the base tree is that there is no
> change in the bindings of the targets.

I am not suggesting putting the targets in the base tree.

I do not know where it should be.  Still thinking about
that part.

> 
> Putting things in the overlay seemed like it would have
> no effect on the base tree whatsoever.
> 
> 
>> -Frank
>>
> 
> Regards
> 
> — Pantelis
> 
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 0/6]  of: overlays: New target methods Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 1/6] of: overlay: Implement target index support Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 4/6] of: overlay: Introduce target root capability. Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 2/6] of: unittest: Add indirect overlay target test Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 3/6] doc: dt: Document the indirect overlay method. Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 5/6] of: unittest: Unit-tests for target root overlays. Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] of: unittest: Unit-tests for target root overlays. Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-17 14:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: dt: Document the target root overlay method Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-16 22:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: dt: Document the target root overlay method Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 15:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: dt: Document the target root overlay method Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-17 18:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/6]  of: overlays: New target methods Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 23:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/6]  of: overlays: New target methods Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-05-27 16:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 0/6]  of: overlays: New target methods Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 22:40 +0200

csiph-web