Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1408175
| From | "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API |
| Date | 2016-05-27 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rDsXM-5NX-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rD8Z3-1RG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDnOq-2G0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 5/27/2016 4:02 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/26/2016 09:43 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>> The upstream commit 1771c6e1a567ea0ba2cccc0a4ffe68a1419fd8ef
>> ("x86/kasan: instrument user memory access API") added KASAN instrument to
>> x86 user memory access API, so added such instrument to ARM64 too.
>>
>> Tested by test_kasan module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Please, cover __copy_from_user() and __copy_to_user() too.
> Unlike x86, your patch doesn't instrument these two.
I should elaborated this in my review. Yes, I did think about it, but
unlike x86, __copy_to/from_user are implemented by asm code on ARM64. If
I add kasan_check_read/write into them, I have to move the registers
around to prepare the parameters for kasan calls, then restore them
after the call, for example the below code for __copy_to_user:
mov x9, x0
mov x10, x1
mov x11, x2
mov x0, x10
mov x1, x11
bl kasan_check_read
mov x0, x9
mov x1, x10
So, I'm wondering if it is worth or not since __copy_to/from_user are
just called at a couple of places, i.e. sctp, a couple of drivers, etc
and not used too much. Actually, I think some of them could be replaced
by __copy_to/from_user_inatomic.
Any idea is appreciated.
Thanks,
Yang
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-05-26 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-27 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-05-27 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-05-27 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-05-27 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-05-27 14:40 +0200
csiph-web