Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1408374

Re: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting
Date Sat, 28 May 2016 05:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <rDDq9-3OF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rvqJr-8s0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvAfM-Dg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwO70-yr-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwXWF-2q8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxdI5-1ir-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8/jWUF+v++ykwOEHkkFNgPUwcYegRt7pc70EJMBKHTQ=; b=T1hxa3Jd5BoCDznnZ6GbBr8yYJ7JNBHy6wQZHdmgfntqds9M8whfQgM3buezn71h6V 1YQEsVmpMnWTuRJh8JE/G6HkU0GBrHgzv8RLp8T/bm/oxBdSsn581pfKHoZHIsrO8nVE M/uYJyxjqVvX0sDwuW2OXUh9bFcIaJF0D81bo7vfUZ7e028Z+rbGex5eajagCBZ3VpB+ 7CLCgpXfn3oygNKQsAtMiK7ofp0pqOZOzzMi/EJ+iSRL/1g5m2ZwKHzjT4bBFcjGcaG4 hI5H+5sYZd42VG/Wl2cYQbaClbFbMt1hzsRMDxDEt1jSfXF3P58RXIKYZ9amgeKtSEoC +WuQ==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8/jWUF+v++ykwOEHkkFNgPUwcYegRt7pc70EJMBKHTQ=; b=D0HPegsuz3IkSTKpnXoe5DQgyUhcsIlIWroAECaXDDdMtVqeUMJtolnaxsaOqGEXiR 6rygwhOv9lOgmtbM/yRI17DZKydu65ZBuaxNaLvsf16rYiQBOwdHVkaqjjPZo5hvZLEc 7h83/kmd3r8HBfgKFLlNjHBmNzQBeIicFUsftFO8ohHkVztvQEwPnqA6/78ybMY+cKcF +6LxN6SuUzPyc296xs4wSm0sIYuUPIQf353+OHqP4DFHoawS5HFVqTYi1wImqqoERdFh WNv9GbFrhXzyU3obg6z2O+dmcjDsdOGzc3p+itS/mnUDlJyx2ewJwDZy6FgRiCfdOHJ0 XVVA==
X-Gm-Message-State ALyK8tKGnFtarm2MlVlmuEmTp61W0wS6BfULzv5VLMJBi0ulfsas1pLLd5MA6jqJQsTI0g==
X-Received by 10.66.127.47 with SMTP id nd15mr27285615pab.84.1464406888655; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 88
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
X-Original-Date Sat, 28 May 2016 11:36:13 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID <20160528033613.GA3291@shlinux2>
X-Original-References <1462451666-17945-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160505224240.GA31429@rob-hp-laptop> <CAPDyKFqpoi03Egfuvd8qJXnn_+FBgPXAb7S4UvkxVs8BA+zwnA@mail.gmail.com> <20160509181829.GA19687@rob-hp-laptop> <CAPDyKFq2=mqujFjvJSYxg2nVmK=OrBKLtFfb-ErNJO3Zr_LMVw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1408374

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:02:08PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Arnd
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> >> Solution
> >> >> ========
> >> >> This is very similar to the MMC pwrseq behavior so the idea is to:
> >> >> 1. Move MMC pwrseq drivers to generic place,
> >> >
> >> > You can do that, but I'm going to NAK any use of pwrseq bindings outside
> >> > of MMC. I think it is the wrong way to do things. The DT should describe
> >>
> >> Huh, I didn't know that was your view of the mmc pwrseq bindings. Why
> >> didn't you NAK them before?
> >
> > Unfortunately, either I missed it or it was a time I couldn't spend much
> > time on reviews.
> 
> Okay, I guess it's common issue among maintainers. The problem with DT
> is that it gets really hard to be fixed up later. :-)
> 
> >
> >> > the devices. If they happen to be "simple" then the core can walk the
> >> > tree and do any setup. For example, look for "reset-gpios" and toggle
> >> > that GPIO. There is no need for a special node.
> >> >
> >> >> 2. Extend the pwrseq-simple with regulator toggling,
> >> >> 3. Add support to USB hub and port core for pwrseq,
> >> >
> >> > We discussed this for USB already[1] and is why we defined how to add
> >> > USB child devices. The idea is not to add pwrseq to that.
> >>
> >> I am not familiar with the USB discussion.
> >>
> >> Still, let me give you some more background to the mmc pwrseq. The
> >> idea from the mmc pwrseq bindings comes from the power-domain DT
> >> bindings, as I thought these things were a bit related.
> >> In both cases they are not directly a property of the device, but more
> >> describing a HW dependency to allow the device to work.
> >
> > I could see this as a board level power domain. However the difference
> > is we are not generally exposing internal SOC details the same way as
> > board level components. Perhaps we could extend power domains to board
> > level, but that is not what was done here.
> >
> >> One could probably use a child node instead of a phandle, but that
> >> wasn't chosen back then. Of course you are the DT expert, but could
> >> you perhaps tell me why a child node is better for cases like this?
> >
> > If there is a control path hierarchy, then we try to model that in DT
> > with child nodes. In cases of SDIO and USB, there is a clear hierarchy.
> > Ignoring the discovery ordering problem, we already have defined ways to
> > describe GPIO connections, regulators, etc. to devices. Describing those
> > things separately from the device to solve a particular issue that is
> > really a kernel limitation is what I don't like.
> 
> Okay, I see.
> 
> To move forward in trying to make mmc pwrseq a generic pwrseq, could
> we perhaps allow both cases?
> 
> In the mmc case, there are already deployed bindings so we need to
> cope with these by using the phandle option, but for USB etc we could
> force the child node option.
> As long as we agree that we keep using a compatible string for the
> child node as well, both options should be able to co-exist and we
> should probably be able to managed them both from a common pwrseq
> driver framework.
> 
> Although, I do remember from an older conversations around some of
> mine submission for the mmc pwrseq code, that some people (maybe
> Arnd?) wasn't keen on adding a new framework for this. Perhaps that
> has changed?
> 

All, how we move on for this?

1. Using a generic driver to manage both mmc and USB (and further
subsystem), USB and further subsystem do not use pwrseq node in dts.
2. USB creates the similar driver under drivers/usb for its own use. 

Which one do you prefer, thanks.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 05:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 03:10 +0200

csiph-web