Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1406212

[RFC][PATCH 3/3] locking,netfilter: Fix nf_conntrack_lock()

Show all headers | View raw

nf_conntrack_lock{,_all}() is borken as it misses a bunch of memory
barriers to order the whole global vs local locks scheme.

Even x86 (and other TSO archs) are affected.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -74,7 +74,18 @@ void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 	spin_lock(lock);
 	while (unlikely(nf_conntrack_locks_all)) {
 		spin_unlock(lock);
+		/*
+		 * Order the nf_contrack_locks_all load vs the spin_unlock_wait()
+		 * loads below, to ensure locks_all is indeed held.
+		 */
+		smp_rmb(); /* spin_lock(locks_all) */
 		spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
+		/*
+		 * The control dependency's LOAD->STORE order is enough to
+		 * guarantee the spin_lock() is ordered after the above
+		 * unlock_wait(). And the ACQUIRE of the lock ensures we are
+		 * fully ordered against the spin_unlock() of locks_all.
+		 */
 		spin_lock(lock);
 	}
 }
@@ -119,14 +130,31 @@ static void nf_conntrack_all_lock(void)
 	spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
 	nf_conntrack_locks_all = true;
 
+	/*
+	 * Order the above store against the spin_unlock_wait() loads
+	 * below, such that if nf_conntrack_lock() observes lock_all
+	 * we must observe lock[] held.
+	 */
+	smp_mb(); /* spin_lock(locks_all) */
+
 	for (i = 0; i < CONNTRACK_LOCKS; i++) {
 		spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Ensure we observe all state prior to the spin_unlock()s
+	 * observed above.
+	 */
+	smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
 }
 
 static void nf_conntrack_all_unlock(void)
 {
-	nf_conntrack_locks_all = false;
+	/*
+	 * All prior stores must be complete before we clear locks_all.
+	 * Otherwise nf_conntrack_lock() might observe the false but not
+	 * the entire critical section.
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&nf_conntrack_locks_all, false);
 	spin_unlock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
 }
 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC][PATCH 3/3] locking,netfilter: Fix nf_conntrack_lock() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-24 16:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] locking,netfilter: Fix nf_conntrack_lock() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-24 16:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] locking,netfilter: Fix nf_conntrack_lock() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-26 16:00 +0200

csiph-web