Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1405895

Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in wake_wide

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:00:10PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:12:07PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:58 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > > wake_wide() is based on task wakee_flips of the waker and the wakee to
> > > decide whether an affine wakeup is desirable. On lightly loaded systems
> > > the waker is frequently the idle task (pid=0) which can accumulate a lot
> > > of wakee_flips in that scenario. It makes little sense to prevent affine
> > > wakeups on an idle cpu due to the idle task wakee_flips, so it makes
> > > more sense to ignore them in wake_wide().
> > 
> > You sure?  What's the difference between a task flipping enough to
> > warrant spreading the load, and an interrupt source doing the same? 
> >  I've both witnessed firsthand, and received user confirmation of this
> > very thing improving utilization.
> 
> Right, I didn't consider the interrupt source scenario, my fault.
> 
> The problem then seems to be distinguishing truly idle and busy doing
> interrupts. The issue that I observe is that wake_wide() likes pushing
> tasks around in lightly scenarios which isn't desirable for power
> management. Selecting the same cpu again may potentially let others
> reach deeper C-state.
> 
> With that in mind I will if I can do better. Suggestions are welcome :-)
 
On mobile, the factor is as small as 2 to 4, may easily be exceeded,
so decay at HZ may be too slow.

> > 
> > > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > index c49e25a..0fe3020 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > @@ -5007,6 +5007,10 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
> > >  	unsigned int slave = p->wakee_flips;
> > >  	int factor = this_cpu_read(sd_llc_size);
> > >  
> > > +	/* Don't let the idle task prevent affine wakeups */
> > > +	if (is_idle_task(current))
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > >  	if (master < slave)
> > >  		swap(master, slave);
> > >  	if (slave < factor || master < slave * factor)

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in wake_wide Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2016-05-23 13:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> - 2016-05-23 13:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2016-05-23 14:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> - 2016-05-23 15:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2016-05-23 16:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> - 2016-05-23 17:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2016-05-24 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in  wake_wide Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2016-05-24 09:10 +0200

csiph-web