Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1407306

Re: [PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in register_page_bootmem_info_node

From Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in register_page_bootmem_info_node
Date 2016-05-26 02:40 +0200
Message-ID <rCRvb-7ID-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rCOxk-5WN-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCPtp-6wo-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCQIN-7bB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Ccing Mel.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:36:48PM -0700, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 5/25/2016 3:23 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >On Wed, 25 May 2016 14:00:07 -0700 Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >>register_page_bootmem_info_node() is invoked in mem_init(), so it will be
> >>called before page_alloc_init_late() if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
> >>is enabled. But, pfn_to_nid() depends on memmap which won't be fully setup
> >>until page_alloc_init_late() is done, so replace pfn_to_nid() by
> >>early_pfn_to_nid().
> >
> >What are the runtime effects of this fix?
> 
> I didn't experience any problem without the fix. During working on
> the page_ext_init() fix (replace to early_pfn_to_nid()), I added
> printk before each pfn_to_nid() calls to check which one might be
> called before page_alloc_init_late(), then this one is caught.
> 
> From the code perspective, it sounds not right since
> register_page_bootmem_info_section() may miss some pfns when
> CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, just like the problem
> happened in page_ext_init().

Hello, Mel.

There was an issue in page_ext [1] due to your deferred struct page init
feature. Before your change, we assumed that we can use pfn_to_nid()
after memmap init is called. But, after your change, we can use
pfn_to_nid() after page_alloc_init_late(). Yang found two call sites
that uses pfn_to_nid() before page_alloc_init_late() and they could be
fixed by using early_pfn_to_nid(). I guess that there are more
problems due to this change so it's better to check it by patch author.

One thing I have noticed is that dirty_limit could be set wrongly. It
is intialized by using freepage count. Since it is intialized before
page_alloc_init_late(), freepages are not initialized yet and it could
be wrong. If my analysis is correct, please fix it.

And, could you check again that there is no more problem?

Thanks.

[1]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAmzW4OUmyPwQjvd7QUfc6W1Aic__TyAuH80MLRZNMxKy0-wPQ@mail.gmail.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in register_page_bootmem_info_node Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-05-25 23:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in  register_page_bootmem_info_node Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-26 00:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in  register_page_bootmem_info_node "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-05-26 01:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in  register_page_bootmem_info_node Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-05-26 02:40 +0200

csiph-web