Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1407002

Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range

From Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range
Date 2016-05-25 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <rCIUV-2Ao-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rCixs-2xY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCiQN-2FK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCjDc-3cK-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCmhI-4UX-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:19:05PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> > On 2016/5/24 19:37, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:16:37PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> > >> When we ran mprotect04(a test case in LTP) infinitely, it would always
> > >> failed after a few seconds. The case can be described briefly that: copy
> > >> a empty function from code area into a new memory area(created by mmap),
> > >> then call mprotect to change the protection to PROT_EXEC. The syscall
> > >> sys_mprotect will finally invoke flush_cache_range, but this function
> > >> currently only invalid icache, the operation of flush dcache is missed.
[...]
> Jumping back to the problem at hand:
> 
> It looks like we inherited this from ARM, which has done this for all
> executable mappings since commit  6060e8df517847bf ("ARM: I-cache: flush
> executable mappings in flush_cache_range()"). The commit message refers
> to a4db94d, which doesn't seem to exist, and I assume is
> 115b22474eb1905d ("ARM: 5794/1: Flush the D-cache during
> copy_user_highpage()") which happened to get rebased at some point.
> 
> That all implies that the icache maintenance is only intended to ensure
> that CoW does not result in unexpected incoherency. Which in turn
> implies that flipping permissions with mprotect is not expected to
> synchronise the D and I caches.

Looking through the arm32 history:

2.6.33:
  115b22474eb1 ("ARM: 5794/1: Flush the D-cache during copy_user_highpage()")
  6060e8df5178 ("ARM: I-cache: flush executable mappings in flush_cache_range()")

These both take care of the CoW issue with executable pages.

2.6.37:
  6012191aa9c6 ("ARM: 6380/1: Introduce __sync_icache_dcache() for VIPT caches")

The above is a fix for SMP systems where update_mmu_cache() happens
after the PTE was actually written, so slight chance of race with
another CPU. We generalised it to all ARMv6+ systems (so VIPT caches).

3.1:
  c7e89b16eb90 ("ARM: 6995/2: mm: remove unnecessary cache flush on v6 copypage")

That's when we realised that the CoW problem no longer exists for
non-aliasing VIPT caches. However, the I-cache counterpart 6060e8df5178
has not been reverted.

So I think that for arm64 and arm32 with non-aliasing VIPT,
flush_cache_range() can safely be a no-op.

-- 
Catalin

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-05-24 13:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-05-24 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-05-24 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-05-24 15:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-05-25 05:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-05-25 13:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-05-26 05:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-05-26 13:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-05-26 14:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-05-26 18:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-05-24 17:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-05-25 17:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-05-25 19:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: fix flush_cache_range Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-05-26 18:50 +0200

csiph-web