Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1406827
| From | Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg |
| Date | 2016-05-25 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rCEoi-8jG-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rCgvE-1kA-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCgvE-1kA-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCk6j-3mY-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCnGN-5K5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCqOl-7UA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:04:33PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 19:13 +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 05:59:02AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > ...
> > > > +static int anon_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > > + struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct page *page = buf->page;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (page_count(page) == 1) {
> > >
> > > This looks racy : some cpu could have temporarily elevated page count.
> >
> > All pipe operations (pipe_buf_operations->get, ->release, ->steal) are
> > supposed to be called under pipe_lock. So, if we see a pipe_buffer->page
> > with refcount of 1 in ->steal, that means that we are the only its user
> > and it can't be spliced to another pipe.
> >
> > In fact, I just copied the code from generic_pipe_buf_steal, adding
> > kmemcg related checks along the way, so it should be fine.
>
> So you guarantee that no other cpu might have done
> get_page_unless_zero() right before this test ?
Each pipe_buffer holds a reference to its page. If we find page's
refcount to be 1 here, then it can be referenced only by our
pipe_buffer. And the refcount cannot be increased by a parallel thread,
because we hold pipe_lock, which rules out splice, and otherwise it's
impossible to reach the page as it is not on lru. That said, I think I
guarantee that this should be safe.
Thanks,
Vladimir
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-24 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-24 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-25 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-05-26 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-26 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 16:20 +0200
csiph-web