Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon

From	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon
Date	2016-05-19 14:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rAuW6-7Xo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <rAujn-7ti-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAut4-7xJ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAuCJ-7Be-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAuCK-7Be-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAuMv-7EI-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

2016-05-19 19:56 GMT+08:00 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>:
> On 05/19/2016 01:48 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2016-05-19 19:42 GMT+08:00 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>:
>>> On 05/19/2016 01:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> 2016-05-19 19:23 GMT+08:00 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>:
>>>>> On 05/19/2016 11:26 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think in general a good idea to poll if a timer will expire soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some patch comments:
>>>>>
>>>>> Same for all non-x86 archs:
>>>>>> +static inline unsigned int kvm_arch_timer_remaining(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>>>>
>>>>> A function returning int, without a return statement?
>>>>> That gives at least a compiler warning.
>>>>
>>>> How about return 0 for all non-x86 archs?
>>>
>>> We will provide an s390 implementation soon, but until then a proper
>>> default would be good.
>>>
>>> [....]
>>>>>> +     if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns || (remaining < halt_poll_ns_base)) {
>>>
>>> but then remaining is 0 and the 2nd condition will always be true, no?
>>
>> Nice catch!
>>
>> How about something like below:
>>
>> +       if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns ||
>> +               (remaining != 0 && remaining < halt_poll_ns_base)) {
>
> Maybe just use -1UL to have a "will never expire" and change the return value into u64
> while changing that.

Good idea, I will do it in next version.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 11:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire  soon Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-05-19 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire  soon Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-05-19 13:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 13:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire  soon Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-05-19 14:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 14:10 +0200

csiph-web