Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1403155
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model |
| Date | 2016-05-18 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rAcZc-4DW-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rt12N-1W5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rt12O-1W5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzW81-2af-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rA4RX-7UR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:16:22AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Jessica Yu wrote: > > > What about tasks sleeping on affected functions in uninterruptible sleep > > (possibly indefinitely)? Since all signals are ignored, we wouldn't be > > able to patch those tasks in this way, right? Would that be an > > unsupported case? > > I don't think there is any better way out of this situation than > documenting that the convergence of patching could in such cases could > take quite a lot of time (well, we can pro-actively try to detect this > situation before the patching actually start, and warn about the possible > consequences). > > But let's face it, this should be pretty uncommon, because (a) it's not > realistic for the wait times to be really indefinite (b) the task is > likely to be in TASK_KILLABLE rather than just plain TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Yeah, I think this situation -- a task sleeping on an affected function in uninterruptible state for a long period of time -- would be exceedingly rare and not something we need to worry about for now. -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-05-18 01:00 +0200
Re: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-18 10:20 +0200
Re: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-18 19:00 +0200
Re: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-18 22:30 +0200
RE: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-05-23 11:50 +0200
RE: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-23 20:50 +0200
RE: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-05-24 17:10 +0200
RE: livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-25 00:50 +0200
csiph-web