Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1403024

Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations
Date 2016-05-18 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <rAaun-3d5-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <rzJDP-2NX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzNHw-5fA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzQvE-728-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzSQO-fI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rA51D-7Zz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> > I think there is something way more subtle going on here, and it bothers me
>> > exactly because it is subtle.  It may be that it is OK right now, but there
>> > are alarm bells going on all over my brain on this.  I'm going to stare at
>> > this for a bit and see if I can make sense of it; but if it turns out that
>> > what we have is something really problematic it might be better to apply a big
>> > hammer and avoid future breakage once and for all.
>>
>> Sounds good. I would just like to decouple this from the KASLR improvements.
>> This fragility hasn't changed as a result of that work, but I'd really like to
>> have that series put to bed -- I've spent a lot of time already cleaning up it
>> and other areas of the compressed kernel code. :)
>
> So I disagree on that: while technically kASLR is independent of relocations, your
> series already introduced such a relocation bug and I don't want to further
> increase complexity via kASLR without first increasing robustness.

Well, in my defense, the bug was never actually reachable.

> So could we try something to either detect or avoid such subtle and hard to debug
> relocation bugs in very early boot code?

I've sent this (the readelf patch which detects the bug from the KASLR
series), but hpa wants to do a more comprehensive version. Could we
temporarily use my version of this, since it appears to accomplish at
least a subset of the new goal?

And on a related topic, how would you like me to send Thomas Garnier's
memory base randomization series? Pull request, or as a series like
I've done with the other KASLR improvements?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-12 22:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-05-13 00:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-13 01:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-05-13 22:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 12:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-17 10:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-05-17 11:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-17 16:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-05-17 19:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-17 21:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-05-17 21:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-18 10:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-18 16:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-20 08:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-20 18:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-16 18:00 +0200

csiph-web