Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1403935

Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to CPU-supported frequency

From Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to CPU-supported frequency
Date 2016-05-19 21:40 +0200
Message-ID <rABXA-41A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rx0Uz-5md-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rx0Uz-5md-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAjei-iW-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:37:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> wrote:
> > The mechanisms for remote CPU updates and slow-path frequency
> > transitions are relatively expensive - the former is an IPI while the
> > latter requires waking up a thread to do work. These activities should
> > be avoided if they are not necessary. To that end, calculate the
> > actual target-supported frequency required by the new utilization
> > value in schedutil. If it is the same as the previously requested
> > frequency then there is no need to continue with the update.
> 
> Unless the max/min limits changed in the meantime, right?

Right, I'll amend the commit text. The functionality is correct AFAICS.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index 6cb2ecc204ec..e185075fcb5c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -153,14 +153,26 @@ static void sugov_update_commit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, int cpu, u64 time,
> >   * next_freq = C * curr_freq * util_raw / max
> >   *
> >   * Take C = 1.25 for the frequency tipping point at (util / max) = 0.8.
> > + *
> > + * The lowest target-supported frequency which is equal or greater than the raw
> > + * next_freq (as calculated above) is returned, or the CPU's max_freq if such
> > + * a target-supported frequency does not exist.
> >   */
> >  static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >                                   unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
> >  {
> > +       struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
> >         unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ?
> >                                 policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur;
> > +       unsigned int target_freq = UINT_MAX;
> > +
> > +       freq = (freq + (freq >> 2)) * util / max;
> > +
> > +       cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(entry, policy->freq_table)
> > +               if (entry->frequency >= freq && entry->frequency < target_freq)
> > +                       target_freq = entry->frequency;
> 
> Please don't assume that every driver will have a frequency table.
> That may not be the case in the future (and I'm not even sure about
> the existing CPPC driver for that matter).

For platforms without a frequency table I guess we can just continue
with the current behavior, passing in the raw calculated frequency. I'll
make this change.

At some point I imagine those platforms will want to somehow achieve
similar behavior to avoid very small transitions that do not result in
real benefit. Maybe some sort of threshold % in the schedutil down the
road.

thanks,
Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to  CPU-supported frequency "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-19 01:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to  CPU-supported frequency Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-05-19 21:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to  CPU-supported frequency "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-19 23:10 +0200

csiph-web