Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1347866
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: kvm: Check support for AArch32 for 32bit guests |
| Date | 2016-03-02 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8aX8-5yy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r60Se-1Sg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r60Sf-1Sg-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM Ltd |
On 25/02/16 09:52, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Add a check to make sure the system supports AArch32 state
> before initialising a 32bit guest.
>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> I really wanted to pass kvm_vcpu down to the helpers. But then, I can't
> define the arch specific helper in asm/kvm_host.h due to lack of kvm_vcpu's
> definition yet:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:35:0,
> from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:24:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h: In function ‘kvm_arch_vcpu_validate_features’:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h:344:48: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> return !test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features) ||
Why don't you just have the prototype in kvm_host.h, and move the actual
implementation to something like guest.c? But I think there is a better
approach, see below.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++++
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f9f2779..945c23a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,11 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
>
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_vcpu_validate_features(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *arch_vcpu)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index dda1959..fc4ea37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -787,6 +787,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_set_target(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> set_bit(i, vcpu->arch.features);
> }
>
> + if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_validate_features(&vcpu->arch))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> vcpu->arch.target = phys_target;
>
> /* Now we know what it is, we can reset it. */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 689d4c9..9d60a6c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_types.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
>
> @@ -338,6 +340,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
>
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_vcpu_validate_features(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *arch_vcpu)
> +{
> + return !test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, arch_vcpu->features) ||
> + system_supports_32bit_el0();
> +}
> +
This is really convoluted (it took me 5 minutes staring at the
expression and remembering that AArch32 EL1 implies AArch32 EL0 to get it).
Now, we already have kvm_reset_vcpu() that validates AArch32 support. It
would probably be better to move things there. Thoughts?
> void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
> void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: kvm: Check support for AArch32 for 32bit guests Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: kvm: Check support for AArch32 for 32bit guests Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: kvm: Check support for AArch32 for 32bit guests "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 11:30 +0100
csiph-web