Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1350186
| From | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen |
| Date | 2016-03-04 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8X1L-6Gg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r8Rz3-2wY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8Rz4-2wY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 407a376..31d794c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list);
> DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
> LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
> +static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
>
> struct acpi_dep_data {
> struct list_head node;
> @@ -1453,6 +1454,47 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_fixed_memory32(struct acpi_resource *res,
> + void *context)
> +{
> + struct acpi_resource_fixed_memory32 *fixed_memory32;
> +
> + if (res->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32)
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + fixed_memory32 = &res->data.fixed_memory32;
Should we call acpi_resource_to_address64 instead?
Aside from this the rest looks good.
> + if (!fixed_memory32)
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + *((u32 *)context) = fixed_memory32->address;
> + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> +}
> +
> +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> + u32 addr = 0;
> +
> + /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
> + if (spcr_uart_addr != 0) {
> + if (!acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS))
> + return false;
> +
> + status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> + acpi_get_resource_fixed_memory32,
> + &addr);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (addr == spcr_uart_addr) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "The UART device in SPCR table will be hidden\n");
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
> unsigned long long *sta)
> {
> @@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
> switch (acpi_type) {
> case ACPI_TYPE_ANY: /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
> case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
> + if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> *type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
> status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> @@ -1919,6 +1964,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
> int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> {
> int result;
> + acpi_status status;
> + struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
>
> acpi_pci_root_init();
> acpi_pci_link_init();
> @@ -1933,6 +1980,27 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>
> acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
>
> + /* If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
> + * device in SPCR table.
> + */
> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
> + (struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
> + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
> +
> + if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart) {
> + struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
> +
> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
> + (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
> + else
> + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> /*
> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> --
> 2.0.4
>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 07:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> - 2016-03-04 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> - 2016-03-04 17:30 +0100
csiph-web