Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1347643
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration |
| Date | 2016-03-02 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r84yn-144-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r7S4a-Pg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7S4b-Pg-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <r845j-yf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 07:14 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:08:13PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> + * @active_discharge: Enable/disable active discharge. The values are: >> + * -1: Default, 0: Disable, 1: Enable. > This isn't a good interface, it means that 0 (which is the default value > for static constrants or kzalloc()ed constraints) means to actively > discharge rather than leave the settings unchanged but our general > policy is to not touch anything unless explicitly told to do so. > Yaah, I agree. I had other option to use 0 as default, 1 as disable and 2 as enable. but generally for disable, we use 0 and for enable 1 and that's why I went to -1,0,1 approach. Will it be fine to have this as 0: Default i..e do not change. 1: disable. 2: Enable.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] regulator: Add support for configuration of active-discharge Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-01 14:00 +0100
[PATCH 4/4] regulator: max77620: Add support to configure active-discharge Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-01 14:00 +0100
[PATCH 1/4] regulator: DT: Add DT property for active-discharge configuration Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-01 14:00 +0100
[PATCH 3/4] regulator: helper: Add helper to configure active-discharge using regmap Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-01 14:00 +0100
[PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-01 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-02 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-02 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-02 04:20 +0100
csiph-web