Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1345570
| From | kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [lkp] [futex] 65d8fc777f: +25.6% will-it-scale.per_process_ops |
| Date | 2016-02-29 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7rx1-Av-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
commit 65d8fc777f6dcfee12785c057a6b57f679641c90 ("futex: Remove requirement for lock_page() in get_futex_key()")
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-sbx04/futex1/will-it-scale
commit:
8ad7b378d0d016309014cae0f640434bca7b5e11
65d8fc777f6dcfee12785c057a6b57f679641c90
8ad7b378d0d01630 65d8fc777f6dcfee12785c057a
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
5076304 ± 0% +25.6% 6374220 ± 0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
1194117 ± 0% +14.4% 1366153 ± 1% will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
0.58 ± 0% -2.0% 0.57 ± 0% will-it-scale.scalability
6820 ± 0% -19.6% 5483 ± 15% meminfo.AnonHugePages
2652 ± 5% -10.4% 2375 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs
2848 ± 32% +141.2% 6870 ± 65% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(anon)
2832 ± 31% +57.6% 4465 ± 27% numa-meminfo.node1.AnonPages
15018 ± 12% -23.3% 11515 ± 15% numa-meminfo.node2.AnonPages
1214 ± 14% -22.8% 936.75 ± 20% numa-meminfo.node3.PageTables
712.25 ± 32% +141.2% 1718 ± 65% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
708.25 ± 31% +57.7% 1116 ± 27% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
3754 ± 12% -23.3% 2879 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_anon_pages
304.75 ± 14% -23.1% 234.50 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_page_table_pages
3.53 ± 1% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% perf-profile.cycles.___might_sleep.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
4.34 ± 1% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% perf-profile.cycles.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
1.27 ± 3% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% perf-profile.cycles.__wake_up_bit.unlock_page.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
4.36 ± 1% +29.6% 5.65 ± 1% perf-profile.cycles.drop_futex_key_refs.isra.12.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
6.69 ± 1% +28.1% 8.57 ± 0% perf-profile.cycles.entry_SYSCALL_64
6.73 ± 0% +30.6% 8.79 ± 0% perf-profile.cycles.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs
74.21 ± 0% -11.0% 66.06 ± 0% perf-profile.cycles.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
59.05 ± 0% -21.4% 46.40 ± 0% perf-profile.cycles.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
4.12 ± 0% +78.5% 7.36 ± 1% perf-profile.cycles.get_futex_key_refs.isra.11.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
2.27 ± 3% +24.1% 2.82 ± 4% perf-profile.cycles.get_user_pages_fast.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
26.95 ± 0% +30.0% 35.04 ± 1% perf-profile.cycles.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
13.43 ± 0% +27.2% 17.09 ± 1% perf-profile.cycles.gup_pte_range.gup_pud_range.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake
19.66 ± 1% +28.4% 25.24 ± 0% perf-profile.cycles.gup_pud_range.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
4.33 ± 1% +37.0% 5.93 ± 4% perf-profile.cycles.hash_futex.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
13.59 ± 0% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% perf-profile.cycles.unlock_page.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
15160 ± 19% -34.8% 9883 ± 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
27.25 ± 15% -37.6% 17.00 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.7
21.00 ± 38% -27.4% 15.25 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[2].1
21.00 ± 38% -27.4% 15.25 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[3].1
21.00 ± 38% -27.4% 15.25 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[4].1
1790 ± 0% +42.4% 2549 ± 45% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.21
50033 ± 4% -6.8% 46622 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.29
4398 ± 42% +103.5% 8949 ± 23% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.11
7452 ± 34% +111.3% 15744 ± 54% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.20
3739 ± 13% +213.5% 11723 ± 40% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.23
1648 ± 53% +96.5% 3239 ± 63% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.51
0.25 ±519% -1300.0% -3.00 ±-52% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.24
8632 ± 16% -32.5% 5823 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.1
5091 ± 36% +137.5% 12092 ± 31% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.11
12453 ± 90% -74.6% 3159 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.2
7782 ± 32% +118.2% 16977 ± 46% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.20
2665 ± 48% -49.8% 1337 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.32
1365 ± 11% -14.0% 1174 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.45
1693 ± 51% +147.7% 4193 ± 42% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.51
5023 ± 57% -51.5% 2434 ± 43% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.57
1705 ± 16% +129.6% 3915 ± 48% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.23
536.25 ± 14% -18.7% 435.75 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.45
1228 ± 19% -27.3% 892.50 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.5
1919 ± 55% +88.5% 3617 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.11
7699 ± 35% -43.7% 4335 ± 43% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.24
5380 ± 36% -45.6% 2926 ± 18% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.30
563.25 ± 20% +140.3% 1353 ± 38% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.11
4297 ± 46% -49.1% 2186 ± 39% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.24
2828 ± 47% -47.8% 1475 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.27
3243 ± 36% -54.3% 1482 ± 32% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.30
199.25 ± 6% +100.6% 399.75 ± 32% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.44
1158 ± 64% -67.3% 379.00 ± 46% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.54
242.25 ± 21% +51.0% 365.75 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.55
1009 ± 26% -50.8% 496.50 ± 44% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.59
1736 ± 53% -67.8% 559.25 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.9
lkp-sbx04: Sandy Bridge-EX
Memory: 64G
perf-profile.cycles.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
76 ++---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
74 ++ .*.. .*..*..*.. .*.. .*.. .*.. .*.. .*..*..*..* |
*..*. *..*..*. *..*. *.*. *. *. *. |
| |
72 ++ |
| |
70 ++ |
| |
68 ++ |
| |
| O O O O O O O O O O O |
66 O+ O O O O O
| O O O O O O O |
64 ++-------------O-------------------------------------------------------+
will-it-scale.per_process_ops
6.6e+06 O+----O-O--O------------------------------------------------------+
| O O O O O |
6.4e+06 ++ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
| |
6.2e+06 ++ |
6e+06 ++ |
| |
5.8e+06 ++ |
| |
5.6e+06 ++ |
5.4e+06 ++ |
| |
5.2e+06 ++ |
*..*..*.*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*.* |
5e+06 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
To reproduce:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp run job.yaml
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Ying Huang
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[lkp] [futex] 65d8fc777f: +25.6% will-it-scale.per_process_ops kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-29 09:40 +0100
Re: [lkp] [futex] 65d8fc777f: +25.6% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-29 10:40 +0100
Re: [lkp] [futex] 65d8fc777f: +25.6% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-02-29 18:40 +0100
Re: [LKP] [lkp] [futex] 65d8fc777f: +25.6% will-it-scale.per_process_ops "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-03-01 09:40 +0100
csiph-web