Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1346750
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. |
| Date | 2016-03-01 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7VEK-3d6-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r44nf-5Fl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r44nh-5Fl-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5qYq-1u4-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6vjk-7ja-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:26 PM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > On 02/23/2016 11:36 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:13:17PM -0800, David Daney wrote: >>> >>> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> >>> >>> ADD device tree node parsing for NUMA topology using device >>> "numa-node-id" property distance-map. >> >> >> I still want an adequate explanation why NUMA setup cannot be done with >> an unflattened tree. PowerPC manages to do that and should have a >> similar init flow being memblock based, so I would expect arm64 can too. > > > Many things could be done. Really, we want to know what *should* be done. > > In the context of the current arm64 memory initialization we (more or less) > do: > > 1) early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem(); > 2) memory_present() > 3) sparse_init() > 4) other things > 5) unflatten_device_tree() > > We are already reading information out of the FDT at #1. > > This patch set adds a step between 1 and 2 where we read NUMA information > out of the FDT. The dependency on unflattening is that memblock is up and we can allocate a chunk from it. Isn't that dependency met by step 1 or is there a dependency on sparsemem (or something else)? Rob
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-26 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 18:50 +0100
csiph-web