Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
Date	2016-03-01 16:10 +0100
Message-ID	<r7U5Y-2ju-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <r7T0e-1s3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7TjB-1NM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7Ttg-1QY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7Ttg-1QY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7TMC-1XE-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:42:10PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Agree. My point was actually more about Rafael's schedutil RFC (I should
> probably have posted this there, but I thought it fitted well with this
> example). I realize that Rafael is starting simple, but I fear that some
> aggregation of util coming from the different classes will be needed in
> the end; schedfreq has already something along this line.

Right, but I'm not sure that's a hard thing to add. But yes, it needs
doing.

It also very much has a bearing on the OPP state selection. As already
pointed out, the nearest OPP thing Rafael did is just wrong for DL.

It probably makes sense to pass a CPPC like form into the (software) OPP
selector.

> IMHO, the general approach would be that every scheduling class has an
> interface to communicate its util requirement. Then RT will probably
> have to ask for max, but CFS and DL will do better.

Right, so on IRC you mentioned that we could also use the global (or
cgroup) RT throttle to lower the RT util/OPP.

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-01 15:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-03-01 15:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-01 15:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-03-01 15:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-01 16:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 20:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update  callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-01 15:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2016-03-01 16:00 +0100

csiph-web