Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1344223

Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status()

From Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status()
Date 2016-02-26 13:50 +0100
Message-ID <r6q0h-3i6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r5Zt8-120-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6f4V-3Xh-81@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6nOO-1Jb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6oKS-2sN-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-02-26 13:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> Your original commit adding the original hack that you're now removing
>>> above says that this is to support polled operation: I'm not aware of
>>> DMA engine supporting such a mode.  DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT is a mechanism
>>> where requests can be queued without an interrupt to allow batching.
>>
>> Also it is used to suppress DMA interrupts during audio playback for example.
>> In this case we will run w/o interrupts and the position is polled.
>>
>>> See the raid5/async_tx code, which queues a set of operations without
>>> DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT, with the final operation with DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT
>>> set.
>>
>> We only allow the interrupts to be disabled in cyclic or memcpy mode. With
>> slave_sg we have interrupts as it is needed to move to the next SG.
>>
>>> As the driver is reliant on interrupts to move to the next transfer,
>>> the patch which causes DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT to influence whether
>>> interrupts are sent is actually buggy, and will prevent several
>>> queued DMA operations to fail.
>>
>> Yes, the omap-dma only allows the interrupts to be actually disabled when it
>> is save to do so. slave_sg can not work w/o interrupts so there we don't
>> disable them.
> 
> I get the impression that you haven't taken in what I've said, because
> each fragment of your reply is just repeating what the previous fragment
> said.

Sorry about that. I got it.

> Let me state that I don't believe you need any hacks here, and this patch
> is not necessary: the final operation in a set of chained memcpy()s should
> have DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT set.

calling the omap_dma_callback() from the tx_status() was a bad idea, this is
why I'm fixing it.
As for the DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT not enabling interrupt was introduced by:
4ce98c0a20bef (dmaengine: omap-dma: Add support for memcpy)

While we do not have users submitting multiple descriptors I agree that this
is a possibility and the driver should not fail in such a case.
I can send a followup patch to fix the omap_dma_prep_dma_memcpy()

-- 
Péter

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-02-25 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback()  from tx_status() Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-26 02:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from  tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-02-26 11:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback()  from tx_status() Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-26 12:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from  tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-02-26 13:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from  tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-02-26 15:00 +0100

csiph-web