Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1345093
| From | Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: tty: memory leak in tty_register_driver |
| Date | 2016-02-27 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r6UB4-uL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r2oT8-8aH-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Fyy-3Xf-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4VrB-3HO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
(I was AFK this week. So my reply is a bit late.) On ma, 2016-02-22 at 10:53 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> > > Fascinating issue. Makes zero sense to me. sysfs_init? Anyhow, since > > the > > people actually familiar with this code have stayed silent until > > now, I > > have some obvious questions: > > - does this only trigger with line discipline N_GSM0710? > > - is this a new issue or do older trees also trigger it (in other > > words: have you tried bisecting this)? > > I can say that it does not happen with 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. Side note: 4 (N_STRIP) is unused. As are 8 (N_MASC), 10 (N_PROFIBUS_FDL), and 12 (N_SMSBLOCK). So you could as well skip these for syzkaller's tests. > So there are > chances that it is N_GSM0710-specific. 5 and 6 trigger lots of leaks, > but they are different. I did not try to bisect it. I've looked into this the previous week (because your reproducer resembled the code that triggered the recent N_GIGASET_M101 leak). I was unable to reproduce the issue myself. And, as far as I can remember now, N_GSM0710's open() operation is rather non-trivial. So I soon gave up on hoping to find a leak or any other obvious issue by, well, reviewing the code involved. Sorry about that. Thanks, Paul Bolle
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: tty: memory leak in tty_register_driver Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-02-27 22:30 +0100
csiph-web