Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1344890

Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic

From Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic
Date 2016-02-27 03:30 +0100
Message-ID <r6CNP-4m4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r6hq2-5F3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6s25-4LU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello Petr,

On (02/26/16 15:57), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2016-02-26 12:37:20, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > When watchdog detects a hardlockup and calls nmi_panic() `printk_func'
> > must be restored via printk_nmi_exit() call, so panic() will be able
> > to flush nmi buf and show backtrace and panic message. We also better
> > explicitly ask nmi to printk_nmi_flush() in console_flush_on_panic(),
> > because it may be too late to rely on irq work.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kernel.h | 6 ++++--
> >  kernel/printk/printk.c | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index f4fa2b2..3ee33d5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -469,10 +469,12 @@ do {									\
> >  	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();					\
> >  	old_cpu = atomic_cmpxchg(&panic_cpu, PANIC_CPU_INVALID, cpu);	\
> >  									\
> > -	if (old_cpu == PANIC_CPU_INVALID)				\
> > +	if (old_cpu == PANIC_CPU_INVALID) {				\
> > +		printk_nmi_exit();					\
> 
> This might end up in a deadlock that printk_nmi() wanted to avoid.

aha, I see.

> I think about a compromise. We should try to get the messages
> out only when kdump is not enabled.

can we zap_locks() if we are on nmi_panic()->panic()->console_flush_on_panic() path?
console_flush_on_panic() is happening after we send out smp_send_stop().


> PS: I am sorry for not responding much about the printk problems
> this week. I have attended a training and did not have much time
> for a real work.

no prob.

	-ss

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 04:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-02-26 16:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 03:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 04:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 04:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 05:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-02-29 11:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 10:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-03-01 12:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 14:20 +0100

csiph-web