Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1344858
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided |
| Date | 2016-02-27 01:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r6AM1-2Tv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r3lTc-6Da-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6dmp-2FR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6foe-447-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/26, Shawn Lin wrote: > On 2016/2/26 7:14, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 02/18, Shawn Lin wrote: > >>set_phase does sanity checking of degree and ask sub-driver > > [...] > > >>already there. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> > >> > >>--- > > > >Knee jerk reaction is why does the provider code set a phase that > >isn't requested? Do we need some sort of clk_round_phase() API > >that parallels clk_round_rate() so that drivers know what phase > >they're going to get? Or do drivers not care what phase they get > >when they call clk_set_phase()? > > Hi Stephen, > > drivers should care what phase they get when calling clk_set_phase(i.e > the drivers setting phase to do tuning work should know what the actual > degrees is, which is important for them to decide the sample window > algorithm). > > By looking into the two drivers who use set_phase/get_phase pair > currently, they actually both don'e care what the actual degrees when > they call clk_set_phase. I think that is because the drivers are used > for specific platform which support 0~360 implicitly. But the situation > is NOT always right for cross-platform drivers. So add some sort of > round_phase API is probably sane ? > Do you have such a platform or driver though? I'd rather not do anything unless we actually need to. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-26 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-26 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-27 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-29 02:20 +0100
csiph-web