Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1343013
| From | Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() |
| Date | 2016-02-25 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r60fw-1DX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r5L6N-7D3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r605R-1As-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <r605R-1As-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/25/2016 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 25-02-16 11:01:32, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 02/24/2016 07:09 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >>> This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are >>> charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if >>> current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no >>> free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> >> >> Adding new users of GFP_NOFAIL is deprecated. > > This is not true. GFP_NOFAIL should be used where the allocation failure > is no tolleratable and it is much more preferrable to doing an opencoded > endless loop over page allocator. In that case the comments in buffered_rmqueue, and the WARN_ON in __alloc_pages_may_oom and __alloc_pages_slowpath perhaps should be removed since they are misleading? > >> Where exactly does the >> block allocator fail, I skimmed the code and failing ext4_mb_load_buddy >> seems to be handled at all call sites. There are some BUG_ONs but from >> the comments there I guess they should occur when we try to find a page >> and not allocate a new one? > > I have posted a similar patch last year: > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-6-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org > because I could see emergency reboots when GFP_NOFS allocations were > allowed to fail. >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-02-24 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-02-25 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-02-25 10:10 +0100
csiph-web