Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1343013

Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks()

From Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks()
Date 2016-02-25 10:20 +0100
Message-ID <r60fw-1DX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r5L6N-7D3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r605R-1As-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <r605R-1As-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 02/25/2016 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 25-02-16 11:01:32, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/24/2016 07:09 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are
>>> charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if
>>> current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no
>>> free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
>>
>> Adding new users of GFP_NOFAIL is deprecated.
> 
> This is not true. GFP_NOFAIL should be used where the allocation failure
> is no tolleratable and it is much more preferrable to doing an opencoded
> endless loop over page allocator.

In that case the comments in buffered_rmqueue, and the WARN_ON in
__alloc_pages_may_oom and __alloc_pages_slowpath perhaps should be
removed since they are misleading?

> 
>> Where exactly does the
>> block allocator fail, I skimmed the code and failing ext4_mb_load_buddy
>> seems to be handled at all call sites. There are some BUG_ONs but from
>> the comments there I guess they should occur when we try to find a page
>> and not allocate a new one?
> 
> I have posted a similar patch last year:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-6-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
> because I could see emergency reboots when GFP_NOFS allocations were
> allowed to fail.
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-02-24 18:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 10:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-02-25 10:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 11:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH RFC] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks() Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2016-02-25 10:10 +0100

csiph-web