Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1341093
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 3.2 67/67] sched: fix __sched_setscheduler() vs load balancing race |
| Date | 2016-02-23 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5t9W-2Zj-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r5t0e-2Ub-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
3.2.78-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
__sched_setscheduler() may release rq->lock in pull_rt_task() as a task is
being changed rt -> fair class. load balancing may sneak in, move the task
behind __sched_setscheduler()'s back, which explodes in switched_to_fair()
when the passed but no longer valid rq is used. Tell can_migrate_task() to
say no if ->pi_lock is held.
@stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested)
check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- Adjust numbering in the comment
- Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2791,6 +2791,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
* 1) running (obviously), or
* 2) cannot be migrated to this CPU due to cpus_allowed, or
* 3) are cache-hot on their current CPU.
+ * 4) p->pi_lock is held.
*/
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) {
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_failed_migrations_affine);
@@ -2804,6 +2805,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
}
/*
+ * rt -> fair class change may be in progress. If we sneak in should
+ * double_lock_balance() release rq->lock, and move the task, we will
+ * cause switched_to_fair() to meet a passed but no longer valid rq.
+ */
+ if (raw_spin_is_locked(&p->pi_lock))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
* Aggressive migration if:
* 1) task is cache cold, or
* 2) too many balance attempts have failed.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3.2 67/67] sched: fix __sched_setscheduler() vs load balancing race Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-23 23:00 +0100
csiph-web