Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1341028
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata |
| Date | 2016-02-23 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5sdQ-2hS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r2VFo-57D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Ej8-3cS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r55AB-2Tb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r585s-51i-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:21 PM, PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu> wrote: > On 22 Feb 2016 at 12:46, Kees Cook wrote: > >> GCC really wants to declare the section. :( > > hmm, i see, so how about going about it another way. instead of trying > to do this at compile/link time, do it an load/runtime. one way of doing > it would be to preserve a page in .rodata then map in a code page underneath > that holds your empty function (which you can generate from C). it'd be > somewhat similar to how the vsyscall page on amd64 is mapped (or used to > be mapped) from the kernel image into its userland visible place. I prefer using all the "regular" mechanisms so that I really know I'm exercising the actual case I want to be testing. (i.e. I don't want to bypass the linker.) If only there were some way to filter gcc output, like with plugins. ;) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2016-02-23 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-23 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-23 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2016-02-23 23:10 +0100
csiph-web