Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1341008
| From | David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata |
| Date | 2016-02-23 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5rUt-29C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r2VFo-57D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3ua7-49t-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3v69-4Nn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Ej8-3cS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r55AB-2Tb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:46:28PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:27 PM, PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2016 at 12:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> However, that does not fix the issue Kees is trying to solve, where a
>>> .rodata section is emitted with the "x" bit set, which causes the
>>> linker to complain:
>>>
>>> /tmp/cc50ffWw.s: Assembler messages:
>>> /tmp/cc50ffWw.s:2: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for
>>> .rodata.text
>>
>> in that case why not use a top-level asm statement to set the section
>> and its attributes (and compile the file with fno-toplevel-reorder)?
>
>GCC really wants to declare the section. :(
Why not then just use its mechanism to set the section on the code?
static void do_nothing_rodata(void)
__attribute__((section(".rodata")))
{
return;
}
David
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org> - 2016-02-23 21:40 +0100 Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-23 22:00 +0100
csiph-web