Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1341008

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata

From David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata
Date 2016-02-23 21:40 +0100
Message-ID <r5rUt-29C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r2VFo-57D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3ua7-49t-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3v69-4Nn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Ej8-3cS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r55AB-2Tb-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:46:28PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:27 PM, PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2016 at 12:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> However, that does not fix the issue Kees is trying to solve, where a
>>> .rodata section is emitted with the "x" bit set, which causes the
>>> linker to complain:
>>>
>>> /tmp/cc50ffWw.s: Assembler messages:
>>> /tmp/cc50ffWw.s:2: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for
>>> .rodata.text
>>
>> in that case why not use a top-level asm statement to set the section
>> and its attributes (and compile the file with fno-toplevel-reorder)?
>
>GCC really wants to declare the section. :(

Why not then just use its mechanism to set the section on the code?

static void do_nothing_rodata(void)
	__attribute__((section(".rodata")))
{
	return;
}

David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing  .rodata David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org> - 2016-02-23 21:40 +0100
  Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-23 22:00 +0100

csiph-web