Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property

From	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property
Date	2016-02-23 12:40 +0100
Message-ID	<r5jtT-4EF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r3JLP-7bz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3JLP-7bz-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:12:05PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We mis-merged the original patch from Russell here and so the
> patch went almost all the way, except that we still failed to
> probe when there wasn't a clocks property in the DT node. Allow
> that case by making a negative value from
> of_clk_get_parent_count() into "no parents", like the original
> patch did.

So you apply it anyway, and ignore all further discussion.  I've
no idea what kind of politics is going on here, but it has to stop.

I'm also still waiting for that apology from Mike - never apply a
modified patch without stating in the commit log that it was modified.
It's basically fraud.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-23 12:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - 2016-02-24 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-24 23:20 +0100

csiph-web