Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1342954
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch |
| Date | 2016-02-25 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5Zjs-XU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <r5gZ4-2Qo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5ixQ-3Z2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5s4a-2dy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5D9g-1Oq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5KNt-7fP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2016 12:33 AM, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > For hard coded platform quirks I'd suggest we add x86_platform.quirks flags. For > > example the F00F hack for Xen could be done via: > > > > x86_platform.quirks.idt_remap = 0; > > > > Don't we unconditionally remap the IDT? I think Kees did it for > general purpose hardening due to our complete inability to hide the > IDT address. I.e. I think we can remove the f00f condition entirely. Yeah, indeed - I only judged by the (limited) patch context and assumed the Xen problem was with IDT remapping. But what the quirk really does is only to avoid printing the f00f workaround - i.e. a cosmetic change. I think we should just drop the paravirt_enabled() check. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 00/11] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 08:30 +0100
[PATCH v3 09/11] x86/boot: add BIT() to boot/bitops.h "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 08:30 +0100
[PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 08:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-02-23 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-24 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-02-24 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-02-25 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-03-02 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-03-02 20:50 +0100
csiph-web