Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1342544
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations |
| Date | 2016-02-25 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5RYC-44j-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r5Pk6-27v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5PWO-2Ff-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5PWO-2Ff-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:17:56PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 14:15 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > For multi page allocations smaller than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, > > > the kernel will do direct reclaim if compaction failed for any > > > reason. This worked fine when Linux systems had 128MB RAM, but > > > on my 24GB system I frequently see higher order allocations > > > free up over 3GB of memory, pushing all kinds of things into > > > swap, and slowing down applications. > > > > > > > Just curious, are these higher order allocations typically done by > > the > > slub allocator or where are they coming from? > > These are slab allocator ones, indeed. > > The allocations seem to be order 2 and 3, mostly > on behalf of the inode cache and alloc_skb. Hello, Rik. Could you tell me the kernel version you tested? Commit 45eb00cd3a03 (mm/slub: don't wait for high-order page allocation) changes slub allocator's behaviour that high order allocation request by slub doesn't cause direct reclaim. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-02-24 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-02-24 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-02-24 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-02-25 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-02-25 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-02-25 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-25 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-02-25 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 15:50 +0100
csiph-web