Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1342080

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 07:32:17AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20160223:
> >
> ...
> > The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20160111.
> >
> 
> Might be good to poke the maintainer as I am seeing this for a long
> time in Linux-next.

These are architecture code related build failures that arch maintainers 
need to fix.  Avoiding pulling the tree allows people to ignore the issue, 
which isn't going to get things fixed.  I provided an example how to 
implement the 64 bit __get_user() without generating warnings, and it is 
now up to maintainers to adapt it for their architecture.

		-ben

> - Sedat -

-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: Tree for Feb 24 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-02-24 06:40 +0100
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 07:40 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24 Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> - 2016-02-24 15:40 +0100

csiph-web