Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1339453
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() |
| Date | 2016-02-22 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r4YfL-5YB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r4QLg-ha-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4VKV-47A-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4WQH-51k-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not really an intel-pstate driver guy, just wrote the patch based > on software-review of the stuff :) > > On 22-02-16, 10:17, Chen, Yu C wrote: >> IIRC, >> 1.HWP is hardwarely per-package, CPUs inside one package have one shared HWP. >> 2.Currently all the CPUs share the same HWP settings according to intel_pstate design. >> 3. The policy is per-cpu in intel_pstate driver.(policy->cpus only contains one cpu) >> >> So with this patch applied, it is likely CPUs may have different HWP settings? > > I think the hardware should be able to cope with that, and should be > selecting the frequency based on the highest frequency requested for > the same package. Otherwise, why should there be an option to supply > per-cpu settings ? Right. I can easily imagine a use case in which someone may want to have different ranges for different CPUs. >> For example: >> CPU 0 belongs to package A with policy 0, and CPU 1 belongs to package B with policy 1, >> If you change the policy 0 from powersave to performance, then only CPU0 will update its >> min/max freq in HWP, however we should also update CPU 2's min/max in HWP settings? >> Plz correct me if I'm wrong.. > > I will let the official intel-pstate guys reply to that. My opinion is to do what your patch does until that proves to be a problem in practice. Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-22 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-22 10:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-02-22 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-22 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-02-22 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] intel-pstate: Update frequencies of policy->cpus only from ->set_policy() Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-22 19:30 +0100
csiph-web