Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1339198
| From | Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs |
| Date | 2016-02-22 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r4TJ9-2LT-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r0VzP-6IR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0VzP-6IR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3wEX-626-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Peter,
On 02/18/2016 08:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:15:26PM +0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> static void perf_iommu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>> {
>> + int i;
>> u64 delta = 0ULL;
>> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>> + struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu = container_of(event->pmu,
>> + struct perf_amd_iommu,
>> + pmu);
>>
>> + if (amd_iommu_pc_get_counters(_GET_BANK(event), _GET_CNTR(event),
>> + amd_iommu_get_num_iommus(),
>> + perf_iommu_cnts))
>> return;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Now we re-aggregating event counts and prev-counts
>> + * from all IOMMUs
>> + */
>> + local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < amd_iommu_get_num_iommus(); i++) {
>> + int indx = get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx(perf_iommu, i,
>> + _GET_BANK(event),
>> + _GET_CNTR(event));
>> + u64 prev_raw_count = local64_read(&perf_iommu->prev_cnts[indx]);
>> +
>> + /* IOMMU pc counter register is only 48 bits */
>> + perf_iommu_cnts[i] &= GENMASK_ULL(48, 0);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Since we do not enable counter overflow interrupts,
>> + * we do not have to worry about prev_count changing on us
>> + */
>> + local64_set(&perf_iommu->prev_cnts[indx], perf_iommu_cnts[i]);
>> + local64_add(prev_raw_count, &hwc->prev_count);
>> +
>> + /* Handle 48-bit counter overflow */
>> + delta = (perf_iommu_cnts[i] << COUNTER_SHIFT) - (prev_raw_count << COUNTER_SHIFT);
>> + delta >>= COUNTER_SHIFT;
>> + local64_add(delta, &event->count);
>> + }
>> }
>
> So I really don't have time to review new muck while I'm hunting perf
> core fail, but Boris made me look at this.
>
> This is crazy, if you have multiple IOMMUs then create an event per
> IOMMU, do _NOT_ fold them all into a single event.
These are system-wide events, which are programmed on every IOMMU the
same way. I am not sure what you meant by creating an event per IOMMU.
Do you mean I should create internal per-IOMMU struct perf_event for
each event? Could you please give me some pointers?
> In any case, the reason Boris asked me to look at this is that your
> overflow handling is broken, you want delta to be s64. Otherwise:
>
> delta >>= COUNTER_SHIFT;
>
> ends up as a SHR and you loose the MSB sign bits.
Ah. Sorry, I missed that.
Thanks,
Suravee
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-02-11 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-18 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-02-22 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-22 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-02-18 14:30 +0100
csiph-web