Re: [FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis

From	Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis
Date	2016-02-18 00:10 +0100
Message-ID	<r3jom-4YQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r373P-4xY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Daniel Wagner
<daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>
> Maybe the first 3 patches might be okay to get merged.

Yes, the first 3 looks simple and obvious correct.

Chris

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> - 2016-02-17 11:00 +0100
  Re: [FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org> - 2016-02-18 00:10 +0100

csiph-web