Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1336863

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy.

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy.
Date 2016-02-18 00:10 +0100
Message-ID <r3jol-4YQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r2mHF-6N6-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3jeG-4Do-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3jeG-4Do-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>> Tony, are you able to pull these?
>
> I've been distracted ... I need to dig into the pile of pending pstore patches.
>
> Was there a consensus on the device tree ones? I saw a "you shouldn't do that",
> and a "but it's really convenient and doesn't hurt anyone else" exchange.

Honestly, I'm a bit unclear where the DT stuff stands... that thread
got long. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy. Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> - 2016-02-15 09:30 +0100
  RE: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of  memcpy. "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2016-02-18 00:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy. Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-18 00:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy. Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-02-18 00:00 +0100

csiph-web