Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1336373

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE

From Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
Date 2016-02-17 13:30 +0100
Message-ID <r39p3-6nX-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qBgqe-8gM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBgqe-8gM-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2Ugh-4i7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization ARM

Show all headers | View raw



On 16/02/16 20:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 02:10:45 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> ACPI 6.0 adds a new method to specify the CPU idle states(C-states)
>> called Low Power Idle(LPI) states. Since new architectures like ARM64
>> use only LPIs, introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE to
>> encapsulate all the code supporting the old style C-states(_CST)
>
> No.
>
> The way it really should work is to check if the firmware supports LPI
> (and what kind of it) and try to use _CST if LPI is not supported.
>

Agreed

> If LPI is supported by the firmware, use it if the LPI objects are
> present as expected or fall back to using _CST otherwise.
>

I have something similar but I need to reverse the order I think.

> This way it all should work without any new Kconfig options.
>

I agree with you in terms of avoiding new Kconfig option. However the
main reason for adding it is to avoid declaring dummy functions and
variables on ARM64.

It's hard to justify the maintainers as it's totally useless on ARM64.
E.g. boot_option_idle_override, IDLE_NOMWAIT, acpi_unlazy_tlb,
arch_safe_halt.

Other option is to push those under CONFIG_X86, but then I don't have
much idea on what are all needed for IA64, so took an option that
encapsulates everything under CSTATE feature Kconfig, which is not user
visible and selected by archs supporting it by default.

I am open to any other alternative.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-02-16 21:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce  ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-02-17 13:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce  ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-02-22 14:50 +0100

csiph-web