Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1336247

Re: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within up()

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 06:11:51PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> change from v2 to v3
> - the way to solve it in v2 is racy, so I changed the approach entirely.
> - just make semaphore's trylock use spinlock's trylock.
> 
> change from v1 to v2
> - remove unnecessary overhead by the redundant spin(un)lock.
> 
> Since I faced a infinite recursive printk() bug, I've tried to propose
> patches the title of which is "lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive
> cycle in the debug code". But I noticed the root problem cannot be fixed
> by that, through some discussion thanks to Sergey and Peter. So I focused
> on preventing the deadlock.
> 
> -----8<-----
> From 43e029ca920890ac644e30d873be69cf5d01efdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:22:18 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within up()
> 
> One of semaphore acquisition functions, down_trylock() is implemented
> using raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock) even though it's enough to use
> raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(). Furthermore, using raw_spin_lock_irqsave()
> can cause a unnecessary deadlock as described below. Just make it use
> the spinlock trylock to implement the semaphore trylock so that we can
> avoid the unnecessary deadlock happened.
> 
> The scenario the bad thing can happen is,
> 
> printk
>   console_trylock
>   console_unlock
>     up_console_sem
>       up
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags)
>         __up
>           wake_up_process
>             try_to_wake_up
>               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock)
>                 __spin_lock_debug
>                   spin_dump
>                     printk
>                       console_trylock
>                         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags)
>                         >>> DEADLOCK <<<
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>

Mucking with the semaphore implementation just because printk() is
terminally broken shite really doesn't fly.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within up() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-02-17 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within  up() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-17 10:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within  up() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-02-18 09:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within  up() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-17 11:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] lock/semaphore: Avoid an unnecessary deadlock within  up() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-02-18 09:20 +0100

csiph-web