Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1334104
| From | Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support |
| Date | 2016-02-15 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2gVz-2Vi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qAv7Y-33k-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qGMz7-3Jb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNe9k-4xG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSyTM-4y8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXcSC-4m8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Eduardo, Sascha, On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 15:29 +0800, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Eduardo, > > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:19:40PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi Eduardo, > > > > > > > > > > > That should remove the policy of computing the maximum from this driver. > > > > Please have a look on the work being done [1] to add grouping and > > > > aggregation of thermal zones. With that in place, you should be a matter > > > > of configuring the grouping and selecting max as the aggregation function, > > > > from the thermal core, instead in the driver. Which should give the > > > > system engineer, more flexibility to compose whatever policy based on > > > > the exposed sensors. > > > > > > I think the aggregation of thermal zones is quite useful when it comes > > > to putting different chips together to a system. I am not so sure how > > > useful it is to expose different thermal zones of a single SoC to the > > > device tree. > > > Currently the only control knob we have is the CPU frequency. When any > > > of the sensors on the SoC gets too hot then the only thing we can do is > > > to decrease the CPU frequency. This does not leave much space for > > > configuration in the device tree. > > > What I need to be able is to attach multiple sensors to one thermal > > > zone. The aggregation patch series only partly solves that and I think > > > is inconsistent, but I commented on the series directly. > > > > Any input on this? I really like to get this driver upstream as it is > > currently blocking other Mediatek drivers. > > > > Hi Eduardo, > > Do you have any comment about Sascha's response ? We really hope get > your comment since Mediatek thermal driver already reviewed in public > over half years, and we have other patches [0] [1] depend on thermal > driver. > > [0]: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/394084.html > [1]: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401055.html Friendly ping on the Mediatek thermal driver. The "EFUSE" dependency has now landed in v4.5-rc4. So, AFAICT, the only thing left that may be blocking landing Mediatek thermal driver is resolution of this discussion about thermal zones. Can we kindly resolve this soon so we have a chance to land it in v4.6. Thanks, -Dan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> - 2016-02-15 03:20 +0100
csiph-web